Tuesday, September 29, 2009

The Wisdom of Ravan...(an excerpt)

Ravan abducted Lord Ram’s wife, a crime for which he was killed by Ram himself. So says the Ramayan. The epic makes Ravan the archetypical villain. And since Ram is God for most Hindus, Ravan’s actions make him the Devil incarnate. This justifies the annual burning of his effigy on the Gangetic plains during the festival of Dussehra.


But in the hills of Rishikesh or in the temple of Rameshwaram, one hears that tale of how Ram atoned for the sin of killing Ravan. Why should God atone for killing a villain? One realises that like most things Hindu, the Ramayan is not as simple an epic as some are eager to believe.
Ravan was a brahmin, the son of Rishi Vaishrava, grandson of Pulatsya. Ram, though God incarnate, was born in the family of kshatriyas. In the caste hierarchy, Ram was of lower rank. As a brahmin, Ravan was the custodian of Brahma-gyan (the knowledge of God). Killing him meant Brahma-hatya-paap, the sin of Brahminicide, that Ram had to wash away through penance and prayer. Another reason why this atonement was important was because Ravan was Ram’s guru.


The story goes that after shooting the fatal arrow on the battlefield of Lanka, Ram told his brother, Lakshman, “Go to Ravan quickly before he dies and request him to share whatever knowledge he can. A brute he may be, but he is also a great scholar”. The obedient Lakshman rushed across the battlefield to Ravan’s side and whispered in his ears, “Demon-king, do not let your knowledge die with you. Share it with us and wash away your sins”. Ravan responded by simply turning away. An angry Lakshman went back to Ram, “He is as arrogant as he always was, too proud to share anything”. Ram comforted his brother and asked him softly, “Where did you stand while asking Ravan for knowledge?” “Next to his head so that I hear what he had to say clearly”. Ram smiled, placed his bow on the ground and walked to where Ravan lay. Lakshman watched in astonishment as his divine brother knelt at Ravan’s feet. With palms joined, and with extreme humility, Ram said, “Lord of Lanka, you abducted my wife, a terrible crime for which I have been forced to punish you. Now you are no more my enemy. I bow to you and request you to share your wisdom with me. Please do that for if you die without doing so, all your wisdom will be lost forever to the world”. To Lakshman’s surprise, Ravan opened his eyes and raised his arms to salute Ram, “If only I had more time as your teacher than as your enemy. Standing at my feet as a student should, unlike your rude younger brother, you are a worthy recipient of my knowledge. I have very little time so I cannot share much but let me tell you one important lesson I have learnt in my life. Things that are bad for you seduce you easily; you run towards them impatiently. But things that are actually good for you fail to attract you; you shun them creatively, finding powerful excuses to justify your procrastination. That is why I was impatient to abduct Sita but avoided meeting you. This is the wisdom of my life, Ram. My last words. I give it to you”. After these words, Ravan died.

With 10 heads, 20 arms, a flying chariot and a city of gold, the mighty Ravan is without doubt a flamboyant villain. His sexual prowess was legendary.
When Hanuman entered Lanka in search of Sita, he found the Demon-lord lying in bed surrounded by a bevy of beauties, women who had willingly abandoned their husbands. Ram, by comparison, seems boring — a rule-upholder who never does anything spontaneous or dramatic.
He is the obedient son, always doing the right thing, never displaying a roving eye or a winsome smile. It is not difficult, therefore, to be a fan of Ravan, to be seduced by his power, to be enchanted by his glamour, and to find arguments that justify his actions.
One can’t help but wonder: Why does the poet Valmiki go out of his way to make his villain so admirable, so seductive, so enchanting?
Valmiki describes Ravan as the greatest devotee of Shiva. In many folk versions of the epic, such as Ram-kathas and Ram-kiritis, we are informed that Ravan composed the Rudra Stotra in praise of Shiva, the ascetic-God. He designed the lute known as Rudra-Veena using one of his 10 heads as the lute’s gourd, one of his arms as the beam and his nerves as the strings. The image of Ravan carrying Mount Kailash, with Shiva’s family on top, is an integral part of Shiva temple art.
Perhaps, say some scholars, this expresses the legendary battle between Shiva-worshippers and Vishnu-worshippers. Ram, who is Vishnu on earth, kills Ravan who is Shiva’s devotee.
But this argument falls flat when one is also told that Ram’s trusted ally, Hanuman, is a form of Shiva himself. Valmiki is clearly conveying a more profound idea by calling Ravan a devotee of Shiva. And to understand this thought we have to dig a bit deeper.
Shiva is God embodying the principle of vairagya, absolute detachment. He demonstrates his disdain for all things material by smearing his body with ash and living in crematoriums. The material world does not matter to him. Ravan may be his great devotee; he may sing Shiva’s praise and worship Shiva every day, but he does not follow the path of Shiva.
In reality, Ravan stands for everything that Shiva rejects. Ravan is fully attached to worldly things. He always wants what others have. He never built the city of gold — he drove out his brother, Kuber, and took over the kingdom of Lanka. Why did he abduct Sita? Avenging his sister’s mutilation was but an excuse. The real reason was his desire to conquer the heart of a faithful wife. And during the war, he let his sons brothers die before entering the battlefield himself.
Ravan has 10 pairs of eyes, which means he can see more. Ravan has 10 sets of arms, which means he can do more. Ravan has 10 heads, which means he can think more. And yet, this man with a superior body and superior mind submits to the basest of passions.


Despite knowing the Vedas and worshipping Shiva, he remains a slave of his senses and a victim of his own ego. He arrogantly shows off his knowledge of detachment but is not wise enough to practice detachment. Deluded, he gives only lip-service to Shiva. This pretender is, therefore, killed by Ram, who, like Shiva, is another form of God.

Dussera is nothing but the killing of a very wise, charismatic, talented and amazing individual. Hence I refuse to celebrate it. Id much rather just call it Vijayadasami and celebrate it by reading 2-3 lines out of every book on the pooja table and playing 2 lines on the various instruments.


Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Terrorism...with a twist

Before you go about assuming this is again one of those opinionated soul searching diatribes about terrorism and its evils, let me get one thing straight. This is nothing to do with that kind of terrorism. I am talking about 'Mental Terrorism'.
Men.tal Ter.ror.ism [men tal ter-uh-riz-uh-m] - noun. 1) The use of extreme stupidity or idiocy or threats of exhibiting maximum retardation to coerce or suppress others, could be for any reason

I have been regularly oppressed by mental terrorism through all walks of my life. The latest being my 2 year tryst with my MBA college where big time supremos and leaders of major terrorist organisations practiced extreme guerilla warfare while unleashing detonations (also knows as 'statements' in this case) on us unsuspecting fellow class-mates and subjecting them to unconditional surrender for lack of any response. I shall highlight a few examples in the following paragraphs.
The entire class was innocently sitting, minding its own business, paying as little attention as possible to the professor who was avidly discussing a case that nobody gave a fuck about! We normal people sitting in the back of the class preaching the below picture:


An interesting factoid that is worth noting here is that almost all mental terrorists usually occupy the front benches and attack so that the detonation can have maximum dissemination.
So while this wonderful case which ranked a ZERO on the "Giveafuckometer" was being discussed, a supremely skilled mental terrorist suddenly launched a massive attack by saying "But ma'am! I think the manager for trying to SOOTHIFY the employees!". While the rest of us were still recovering from this moronous attack, he followed it up with an even more powerful detonation - "I think SOOTHIFICATION is the key to preventing a strike!". No shit Einstein! I am a tamilian, come down here to the back row and I will introduce you to whole new level of soothification - tamilian style (my tamilian friends should get this one).

This next attack was pure guerilla style - by a mental terrorist who definitely measured 2 x 2 x 2 and could easily be disguised as a sphere on all planes. This sadistic moron decided to unleash her attack on the class at the most inopportune moment - when she wasnt even asked to do so or even asked for her opinion. A professor asked us to define 'statistics'. The rest of the population was still considering what answer to give when this high qualified mental terrorist who claimed to be a statistics major and having received highest levels of training in all attack forms in that domain, decided to unleash a suicide bomb mental attack on the class. Her response "Sir, statistics is the method of collecting and putting numbers and figures together and then statistically trying to make something out of it". WTF?? WTF kind of a piss-poor response is that? This terrorist who was the product of a broken condom and a failed abortion terrorized half the class into passing out with her sheer skill in stupidity. Suicide attack. Why? Because the professor coolly went "Hot Air Balloon!" - which aptly described the terrorist's physical appearance.

Watch this space....more to come :)